How to Audit Websites on Different CMS Platforms
Published 08 April 2021
If you’re reading this on Sitebulb’s blog, odds are you understand the value of a good SEO audit.
Not an export-some-spreadsheet and send it to the developers kind of an audit. Audits that apply critical thinking. That take each project and not only spot the mistakes, but look at the bigger picture. Audits that then go on to get those recommendations implemented. If you're not bought into all this yet, maybe have a look at this SEO audits 101 guide first.
Many guides cover why you need to pay attention to site structure, internal linking, copy, site speed, and all that jazz. But what if you had knowledge upfront about the kind of SEO issues and quirks you might find on the site, based on the Content Management System (CMS) or platform it’s built on - before you press the big ol’ Crawl button?
That would be handy, right?
Knowledge of the platform a site’s built on and the technology used can make a world of difference when auditing.
Table of contents:
- Why is a website's CMS platform important for SEO?
- What are the most common CMS platforms in 2021?
- How can you find out what CMS a website uses?
- What about the wider tech stack?
- How to find out what technology a website is using?
- How should a website’s technology influence your SEO audit?
- Know your platforms
- What’s going to hold you back?
- Making the case for tech stack changes
- Wrapping Up
Why is a website's CMS platform important for SEO?
As some smart SEO once said:
“All platforms and CMSs are not created equal in the eyes of an SEO.”
Or something like that.
Some CMSs are better suited to certain types of websites than others, and some platforms are far more customisable than others.
Most platforms will also come with their own issues and constraints. These are all things that SEOs need to be aware of and take into consideration when doing audits.
As SEOs we don't always get input at the early stages of a redesign/migration/platform change, which is a bit of a pain in the arse - and another post entirely. So when a CMS is already in place (which is usually the case), we need to understand what we’re working with.
What are the most common CMS platforms in 2021?
Every six months Joost of Yoast fame digs into the data that W3Techs supplies and makes it a little prettier. Seriously though , the actual data provided by W3techs really could be a hell of a lot more appealing.
So let's have a look.
Unsurprisingly you can see that WordPress is the dominant CMS on the market - and that's isn't going to change anytime soon. It's also interesting to see that the number of website owners which don’t use a CMS are starting to decline.
What are the other popular CMSs and their market share? It's a little tough to see on that graph so let's have a quick look-see at a table.
Joost also provides some context to these numbers, which I have unceremoniously stolen.
- WordPress - the #1 CMS with a 39.0% market share, 4.2% higher than November 2019.
- Shopify - overtook Joomla as the #2 this year, has 3.1% market share, which is up 1.4% over the last 12 months.
- Joomla - lost 0.5% market share in the last 12 months and is now at 2.2%.
- Drupal - went from 1.7% to 1.5% over the course of the last 12 months.
- Squarespace - winning 12 months ago, is relatively stable at 1.4%. Wix overtook it and is now at 1.5%. Wix seems to be taking more advantage of the COVID situation than Squarespace.
- The other “winners” are Bitrix (1.0%, up 0.2%) and Blogger (1.0%, up 0.2%).
Thanks, Joost - and just for reference, this data was all correct as of November 2020.
So let's crack on.
If you're doing an audit for a pitch, you're going to want to know what technology a potential client is using. You don't want to be pitching low if you know the technology is a pain in the arse to work with.
How can you find out what CMS a website uses?
This is pretty simple, most crawlers and SEO tools (such as Sitebulb or Semrush) will tell you what CMS a site is using.
But often you’ll just want to do a quick check, so there are a couple of standalone tools that I like to use. They're also pretty handy if you're on the phone with a potential client, as you can grab the data fast.
It feels like Builtwith has been around forever, and for a long time it was my go-to tool.
To find out what CMS a site is using you need to head over to the homepage and bang in the domain.
Click lookup, and hey presto.
Wappalyzer is a newer tool, built by the guys at AWR - and to be honest, I like it better.
Head over to the home page and drop the URL of the site that you want to check, and off you go.
Yeah, yeah. I know. Before anyone points it out, I really should remove Google Plus, right?
Manual link structure analysis
What if you've run out of credits on one of the above tools and don't have the budget to pay for some? Are there other ways you find out what CMS a site is using?
There sure is. Pretty much every CMS has a unique link structure that can help you identify what a site uses.
Here's a couple of simple checks that you can manually perform by looking at the page source code.
Dig around for this kind of structure:
You are looking to unearth something like this:
Admin login URLs
Most popular CMSs have a specific admin URL that helps you identify what a site is using.
All you need to do is add the following after the name of the site.
This doesn’t work every time, however. More security-conscious sites may have disabled these to add a site-specific one.
For example, on the Boom site, you can try and add one of the variations:
But that’ll just lead you to the 404 page.
There are a bunch of other ways that you can locate CMS information, including (but not limited to):
- In the robots.txt
- In the source code itself
- In the footer of the site
Now you know how to find out what CMS a site is using, you can dig a bit further. Knowing a site is apparently running on WordPress - or whatever - is great, especially since not all CMSs play nicely with all technologies.
What about the wider tech stack?
Beyond the CMS, it’s crucial that you know what other technologies are being used. The earlier you identify this, the more pain it can save you further down the line.
So let's dig in.
How to find out what technology a website is using?
Yeah, we mentioned Wappalyzer earlier, but it's worth mentioning again, seeing as it's so damn good.
Simply follow the same instructions as before to uncover other technologies being used.
It would be amiss for me not to mention Sitebulb here. Not because I’m writing on their site, but because I use it pretty much every single day and have for years (cheque in the post, please fellas).
When you run an audit, Sitebulb will flag all the technologies it comes across.
Sitebulb might not be the ideal tool when you’re doing things on the fly, but it's excellent for an in-depth dive as part of a more extensive audit.
Handily you can also click on the number to the right of each technology and see what pages it’s being used on.
This allows you to make recommendations based on specific templates or sections of a site - saving time and money in the long run.
Like many other tool suites, Sistrix has a technologies section that helps you uncover what's being used on a site. But they have a killer feature that I've not seen in other tools. They recently launched the technology history feature.
You can now look back through a site's history to see what technology was added and removed, and when. As you might imagine, this allows you to diagnose issues that you previously could not.
Let's say that a site experiences a significant drop in traffic around the time of one of Google's many algorithm updates.
But you've been digging deep, and everything seems in order. There's no manual penalty. There are no issues with the content. A developer hasn’t accidentally deleted all title tags for the second time (yes, that has happened to me).
If you spoke to your client and asked them about a new site or migration, they might have some information, but they are unlikely to be able to tell you what technology they used in their old site.
As it's a relatively new feature, the data only goes back a year or two, but you can see how this might considerably improve your audits.
How should a website’s technology influence your SEO audit?
So you're armed with all the information about the platform and technology used. Great. But what are you gonna do with it?
Know your platforms
I’m not saying that you should know all the quirks of each CMS straight off the bat - that would be ridiculous. Your knowledge is built over time.
When you start to crawl and audit different CMSs, keep a document of the little quirks you find. If you work within a team of SEOs, having that document shared between everyone means you can learn from each other.
No SEO is their own island. We all learn from each other, whether as an internal team or part of the wider community. We’re a generous bunch, you know?
What’s going to hold you back?
No CMS will be completely free of SEO issues - it's just not possible, and each has its little quirks.
This article isn't a “how to do SEO on Squarespace” type article, but I thought I would just jot down some of the issues that pop up most commonly when SEO Twitter is having a good old moan.
Here are some of the bigger historical issues that we’ve seen with some of the more popular CMSs. If they've been fixed, somebody give me a shout.
Historic issues with WordPress:
- Devs gone crazy with a million plugins slowing the site down
- Third-party themes with massive CSS theme files
Historic issues with Shopify:
- A robots.txt that you can’t edit
- Duplicate content issues
- Duplicate title tag issues
- Tag pages that cant be edited
- A URL structure that can't be changed
Historic issues with Squarespace:
- Distinct lack of plugins
- Old templates that just don't cut the mustard
- Poor implementation of schema markup
Historic issues with Wix:
- Limited heading tags
- Adding odd strings to URLs
- No canonical tags in bulk
While the uptake on SEO for many CMSs has been slow, it's worth noting that they are ALL (well, almost all) now making significant strides to become more SEO friendly.
Wix recently announced their Wix advisory board run by Mordy Oberstein and consisting of Andrew Optimisey, Simon Cox, Michelle Robbins, Nick LeRoy, Areej AbuAli and Cindy Crum. That's a solid board of SEO pros that know their shit.
It's probably worth following Chris Green's story as he moves his blog to Wix from WordPress - what!
Making the case for tech stack changes
Once you're ready to present your findings, you might want to take a little step back.
Many SEOs bemoan the fact that none of their recommendations get actioned. And as we are human, it's all too easy to think that's the fault of the guys we are presenting the ideas to - whether that’s clients, stakeholders or developers.
An audit isn't worth anything if you don't get the recommendations implemented. It's not only the SEOs job to produce the audit; it’s their job to get things actioned.
And that's another skill set entirely. Let's take a look at how you can take your recommendations and get them applied.
Communicating with clients
The biggest issue you're going to encounter when talking to the higher-ups about getting audit recommendations actioned is that they're not likely to care about the details.
You're going to have to pitch in a language they understand.
Here’s a couple of tips.
If the technology used is holding the site back, compare it to competitors’
Clients and stakeholders never like to be seen to be lagging behind their competitors. If your audit shows that the technologies used are holding you back, you need to pinpoint competitors that are using tech that’s helping their sites get ahead.
As well as showing (and briefly) talking about the technology used, you can then take some SEMrush or Ahrefs data and make the case that changing technology can and does change your ability to rank.
For example, here's a client that I worked with years ago. Despite our efforts to get the clients’ developers NOT to use infinite scroll, they overruled us.
Can you guess when the new technology was launched?
Here's another example of when a client (before our time) built a new site and swapped the technology that it was built on.
And here's what happened - yeah yeah, correlation is not causation and all that jazz, but…
Communicate business benefits
The technology that's used can and does affect the performance, productivity and profitability of employees. If you discover during the audit process that employees have to go through convoluted methods to get content uploaded, use it to your advantage.
Clients never want to be spending more money than necessary. Use this to your advantage too.
Some quick maths that shows how much time staff spend using dated or cumbersome technology, and how much time can be saved by building afresh, is often a winner.
Simply taking the time that is spent and how it could be saved and then showing how many ££££’s could be saved by the client per month and per year is a surefire way to get their attention.
Speak their language - not yours.
Communicating with developers
Communicating with developers is another thing entirely - especially if it is the same developers that built the site.
It's their baby. They spent months on it.
Look, it does this cool parallax scrolling stuff - it's amazing.
Going in like a bull in a china shop isn't going to help you one bit. You're going to get pushed back. You're going to create a tension that it can be hard to fix in the future.
So how do you get devs onboard?
Don't worry, I’ve got you covered.
Don't just chuck it on their lap - offer guidance (but not necessarily a solution).
Devs like to solve problems; devs like to get stuck into the nitty-gritty, and stamping your authority down is likely to cause tension.
SEO isn't their job; development is. But you can communicate with them in the same way you would with a client.
Present the data that shows why a fix is essential. Not all devs are SEO savvy - and there's nothing wrong with that. Not all SEOs are development savvy, either.
Don’t then tell them how they should do their job. Work with them, listen to their opinions, and find a solution that works for both sides.
Respect their time and workloads
This isn't so dev-specific but it is important. You need to understand and respect their workload. Some technical SEO issues are not quick fixes, and sometimes, when the tech involved is complicated, it might take a while to get your recommendations addressed.
Let them scope the work correctly and come back to you with time estimates or cost estimates.
I’m not saying you're going to agree with them 100%, but you've opened a mutual dialogue. A dialogue that is much more healthy.
Respect is vital in getting your recommendations addressed - and creates a long term relationship that's better for all involved.
Get buy-in from the client or stakeholder first
At the end of the day (no matter whether you're working with in-house or external devs), they will be working towards broader business goals. These goals were likely set out long before this SEO peep popped along and gave them a list of tasks to do.
When they are working towards company goals, it's crucial to get the client’s buy-in first.
When you've demonstrated to the client why they need to get your recommendations actioned, it's easier to get buy-in from the development team.
Learn how they work
Not all teams work the same way - and more often than not, a development team will work differently from an SEO team.
Learn their language. Learn their processes
When you're familiar with sprints and scrums, it can allow you to communicate more easily with the dev team.
When you've brushed up on what the heck epics and user stories are, you’ll get more respect.
At the end of the day, your client and you - as the SEO - need to get your recommendations implemented to understand how the dev team will be working and what approach they will take.
Trust me, it works better in the long run.
Thanks for sticking around to the end faithful reader. Probably just the one of you, given the length of that.
Hopefully, I’ve successfully highlighted why having a deep understanding of the platforms and CMSs that sites are built on can inform your decisions before starting an audit. Hopefully I’ve also set in motion a deeper investigation of what different technologies are used on sites and how you can use it to your advantage when digging into technical SEO issues.
Happy crawling and helping to make the web a better place.